EveryoneAvailable

Guide

Getting busy executives to answer a scheduling poll

Senior people are not ignoring your poll because it is a poll. They are ignoring it because the ask was vague, the effort was unclear, and nothing visibly happens if they skip it. The organiser's job is to remove every one of those excuses, not to send more reminders, because more reminders to the same vague ask just trains the group to skim past your messages faster.

Create a free availability poll and share it with your group.

Reduce the ask to under a minute

Anything requiring an account, an app, or a calendar connection loses a meaningful share of a senior list immediately. One link, a name, a few taps, done — on a phone, between meetings, with no login screen in between.

Write the message like a decision, not a request

Say what is being decided, what the range is, and when you will close. "Q3 forum days — mark what you can protect by Friday, I'll publish the calendar Monday" gets answers. A bare link does not, because it leaves the recipient to guess what's actually being asked of them.

  • Name the deadline in the message and set it on the poll.
  • Say explicitly that assistants may answer on the member's behalf.
  • Send it where the group already talks, not in a fresh email thread.

Go through the office

For most executives, the fastest path to an accurate answer is their assistant. Address them directly, give them the link, and they will usually answer faster than the principal would, because checking a calendar and marking dates is exactly the kind of task an assistant is set up to handle quickly.

Make it explicit in your message that this is expected and welcome — some assistants hesitate to answer on their principal's behalf unless told directly that it's fine, and that hesitation is often what delays a response by days.

One reminder, then decide

Send a single reminder to the non-responders the day before the deadline, then publish the decision. Groups that wait indefinitely train their members that deadlines are optional, and the next poll gets fewer answers, not more.

Treat repeated non-response as data, not an accident

If the same one or two people never answer any poll, stop treating each instance as a one-off. Set a standing rule with them directly — for example, that you'll schedule around their availability from a shared calendar they maintain, or that their assistant is the sole point of contact — so the pattern doesn't repeat every single round.

Worked example

Example: a 12-person leadership team that had stalled at four replies

A COO needed a half-day strategy session booked for October with eleven direct reports and peers. The first email asking "what dates suit you?" produced four replies in nine days, two of them asking what the meeting was for.

  1. 1Narrowed the window to twelve working days in the first three weeks of October rather than "sometime in Q4".
  2. 2Created one poll with those dates and two time slots per day, 9am-1pm and 1pm-5pm, so nobody had to describe their morning.
  3. 3Sent the link with the purpose, the length and a deadline in the first line: "Half-day strategy session, four hours, please answer by Friday."
  4. 4Copied the same link to the two assistants who manage the busiest calendars, since they answer faster than their principals.
  5. 5Chased once on the Thursday with the names of the four people still outstanding rather than a message to all twelve.

Eleven of twelve answered within four days. The organizer locked in 14 October, 9am-1pm from the ranked results, and the confirmation link put it straight into everyone's calendar without a second thread.

Frequently asked questions

How do you get a low-response group to answer a date poll?
Make the answer take under a minute with no account, state a deadline in the message, copy assistants directly, and send one reminder before you decide. Response rate follows clarity and effort, not the tool.
Should I chase everyone individually?
Only the people who have not answered, and only once. The organizer view shows who is missing, so a targeted nudge is quick and does not annoy the people who already replied.
Is it appropriate for an assistant to answer a scheduling poll on someone's behalf?
Yes, and saying so explicitly in the message speeds things up considerably. Most assistants already manage their principal's calendar and are well placed to answer accurately and quickly.
What if one person never responds no matter what you try?
Set a standing arrangement with them directly rather than re-solving it every round — for instance, agreeing that the group will schedule around a calendar they keep updated, or routing all requests through their assistant permanently.

Find the day everyone can make it

Create a free availability poll and share it with your group.

Last updated 2026-08-20